Golf is unique among major sports. It has no standard playing field, and no two courses are alike. That’s part of its charm—and part of its challenge. But when one event starts to feel more like survival than sport, something's gone awry. And in the golfing world, that event is the U.S. Open. This article explores whether the U.S. Open, in its relentless pursuit of toughness, has gone too far. Is it still a celebration of elite skill, or has it become an annual ordeal that borders on unfair? We’ll look at how other sports treat difficulty, compare those standards to the ever-shifting battlegrounds of the U.S. Open, and consider whether Oakmont 2025 might finally push the boundaries beyond what the game—and the fans—can reasonably accept.
Other Sports Respect Athletes. Why Doesn’t Golf?
The U.S. Open prides itself on being golf’s most demanding major. Every year, organizers lean into the concept of extreme difficulty—narrowing fairways, thickening rough, and speeding up greens. The idea is to preserve “par” and identify the toughest, most complete golfer. But where’s the line between difficult and destructive?
Compare this to tennis. Every major is played on a different surface—clay, grass, or hard court—but the fundamental conditions remain consistent. The court’s dimensions, net height, and rules are stable. Even as technology evolves, the goal remains the same: reward skill, adaptability, and mental strength—not suffer through surface manipulation.
Football is another model of consistency. Pitches may vary slightly in dimension or turf, but the size of the goal remains the same. The ball doesn’t change. The objective remains constant: showcase strategy, teamwork, and execution. No one adjusts the size of the crossbar at the World Cup just to create drama.
So why is golf the outlier? Why is the U.S. Open the only major where setup becomes the headline, and where players are sometimes left bewildered, not by their mistakes, but by the course itself?
The answer lies in control. The U.S. Open gives the USGA enormous power—over pin placements, green speeds, and course conditions. And too often, it feels like they use that power not to test players, but to torment them.
The U.S. Open’s Identity Crisis: Test or Torture?
The U.S. Open has long branded itself as “the toughest test in golf.” That phrase has become a badge of honor for both players and organizers. But a test, by definition, is designed to measure performance—not sabotage it.
Oakmont Country Club, the site of the 2025 U.S. Open, is already one of the most punishing venues in golf. It has greens that roll like polished marble, deep bunkers that feel more like excavation sites, and fairways that snake through hazards like tightropes. And that’s before the USGA starts tweaking.
There’s nothing wrong with a challenge. But Oakmont doesn't need help being hard. Over-preparing it risks pushing the tournament into parody.
We’ve seen what happens when the USGA gets it wrong. In 2004, Shinnecock Hills became nearly unplayable, with players unable to stop balls on certain greens due to excessive dryness. In 2015, Chambers Bay's bizarre surface led to widespread criticism—not just from media, but from the players themselves. Dustin Johnson, who missed a short putt to force a playoff, later said the greens were “the worst I’ve ever played on.”
Even players who embrace tough setups—those who prepare for adversity—want to see skill rewarded, not nullified. The U.S. Open should challenge players to be great, not force them into damage-control mode for four straight days.
When Does It Stop Being Golf?
Picture this: Oakmont, late afternoon, with swirling winds and baked greens. A perfectly struck 8-iron hits the middle of the green but trickles off into heavy rough. A well-judged chip runs eight feet past. The par putt misses. Double bogey. That’s not strategy—it’s survival.
Under U.S. Open conditions, we regularly see the world’s best players punished for shots that would be considered brilliant in any other event. That doesn’t just frustrate the players—it confuses the fans. How are we supposed to admire excellence if the course is actively working against it?
There’s a fine line between humility and humiliation. Golf is, by nature, a humbling sport. A sudden gust of wind, an unlucky bounce, a moment of indecision—these things happen. But when the U.S. Open intentionally rigs conditions to manufacture drama, it stops being about golf and starts becoming performance art.
Would a single-digit amateur even finish a round at Oakmont under U.S. Open conditions? Would a scratch golfer break 90? More importantly, does it matter? If the pros can’t compete at a level that highlights their true ability, then what are we watching?
Scottie Scheffler, for example, is arguably the best tee-to-green player on the planet. Do we really want to see him punch out sideways, lag putt from 30 feet, and cross his fingers for bogey? That’s not showcasing the modern game—it’s throttling it.
.webp)
Let the Course Be the Star—Not the Setup
The beauty of the U.S. Open lies in its ability to reveal who’s playing the best golf under the greatest pressure. But that doesn’t require trickery. It doesn’t demand excessive rough or laughable green speeds. It just requires restraint.
Oakmont doesn’t need gimmicks. The mental pressure alone—knowing every misstep is magnified—is enough. The natural architecture already tests every club in the bag. Players don’t need 12-inch rough or 14.5 stimp meters to feel the heat. The gravity of a major takes care of that.
Fans want to see shot-making. They want drama rooted in execution, not accidents. They want to see who can rise, not who can survive. The U.S. Open can be hard—but it must be fair.
This is not a plea for lower scores. No one’s asking for 25-under. But when birdies feel impossible and pars feel lucky, the balance is off. When professionals start playing not to lose rather than trying to win, that’s a red flag.
Every golf fan remembers Payne Stewart’s fist-pump putt at Pinehurst in 1999. Tiger’s domination at Pebble Beach in 2000. Rory’s breakout at Congressional. These weren’t flukes—they were greatness on display under pressure. That’s what the U.S. Open should aim to produce: the highest level of golf played on the most demanding, but fair, courses in the world.
Conclusion
The U.S. Open has delivered some of golf’s most iconic memories. But with each passing year, it seems more focused on protecting par than on honoring performance. In 2025, the USGA has an opportunity to get it right. Oakmont is already fearsome. There’s no need to meddle further. Let the course test the players organically. Let the best rise to the top through execution, not survival. Let the U.S. Open be a championship that celebrates greatness—not just grinds it down. The essence of golf isn’t about who can endure the worst—it’s about who can produce the best when it matters most. That’s what the U.S. Open should stand for. Not a punishment, but a proving ground. Not survival, but supremacy.
Let the brilliance of the players shine. Let the course whisper, not scream. Let the game be hard—but let it still be golf.
FAQ's
1. Why is the U.S. Open considered the toughest test in golf?
The U.S. Open has earned its reputation as golf’s most difficult major because of the way the USGA sets up the course. Unlike other events that aim to reward scoring, the U.S. Open is focused on limiting it. Fairways are narrowed dramatically, greens are made extremely fast, and rough is grown thick to punish even slight misses. Players often say that par feels like birdie during the U.S. Open, and the winning score is usually close to even. It’s not just about beating opponents—it’s about beating the course, or at least surviving it.
2. Has the U.S. Open ever gone too far with its course setup?
Yes, several times in U.S. Open history the setup has sparked controversy. The most infamous example is Shinnecock Hills in 2004, where the greens became so dry and fast that balls wouldn’t stop, even on well-struck shots. In 2015 at Chambers Bay, players criticized the poor quality of the greens, calling them "unputtable" and questioning how such conditions could be allowed in a major. These examples highlight a recurring concern: that in trying to protect par or make the course harder, the U.S. Open sometimes compromises fairness and the integrity of competition.
3. What makes Oakmont a particularly tough U.S. Open venue?
Oakmont is widely considered one of the most challenging golf courses in the world—even without U.S. Open modifications. Its greens are among the fastest in golf, with slopes that demand extreme precision. Bunkers are deep and strategically placed, often forcing players to lay up rather than go for the green. The fairways are tight and surrounded by thick rough. For the U.S. Open, the USGA typically amplifies these features—making the greens even quicker, the rough deeper, and the pins more brutal. It's a course that tests every part of a golfer’s game, especially mental toughness.
4. Why doesn’t the U.S. Open adopt more consistent course standards like other sports?
One of the quirks—and challenges—of golf is that no two courses are the same. While sports like tennis or football play on standardized fields or courts, golf embraces variation. The U.S. Open takes that to an extreme by intentionally tweaking course conditions to create a specific challenge. Unlike other majors like The Open Championship (which adapts to natural links conditions) or the Masters (which plays at the same course every year), the U.S. Open moves to a new venue annually and customizes the setup each time. This has led to criticism that the event sometimes becomes more about setup than about golf.
5. What would make a U.S. Open setup feel “tough but fair”?
A great U.S. Open test should walk a fine line—it should challenge the best players in the world, but not humiliate them. “Tough but fair” means greens that are fast but not unplayable, rough that punishes misses without eliminating recovery options, and pin placements that reward accuracy without requiring luck. It also means adjusting for weather and not letting ego dictate setup decisions. The ideal U.S. Open is one where winning scores remain close to par, but where the best players are still able to showcase their skills—not just survive the punishment.